Is Coronary CT angiogram more reliable than invasive coronary angiogram to diagnose heart disease? - diagnose more condition_symptoms
It's a bit odd that the person who claimed a doctor a question seems quite different from what you are asked to respond to bathe, but I'll try and sort things out.
Loving_Heart answer in relation to diseases of the bile ducts and no coronary artery disease. It's difficult for someone that CT coronary angiography is "better" or "safer" than conventional coronary angiography, for coronary angiography studies have been published almost everywhere, the traditional use as a "gold standard". The accuracy of coronary CT is normally exist with respect to coronary angiography.
The studies were published suggesting that 64-slice CT has a sensitivity of 93-100%, a specificity of 90-95% and the positive and negative predictive value of 75-85% or 95-100%, respectively, has for the detection of significant coronary stenosis. In other words, the CT angiography a very good and feels better. At this stage it is to say a little better that we do not heart disease than those who do notis and who is much less useful to humans, stents or bypass.
Diagnose More Condition_symptoms Is Coronary CT Angiogram More Reliable Than Invasive Coronary Angiogram To Diagnose Heart Disease?
1 comments:
Invasive coronary angiography is no gold standard for the visualization of coronary vessels.
The image of CT angiography is often obscured by artifact caused by calcium in the blood vessels, the chest movement of the patient, dates, and today has shown that the reproducibility is significantly higher than that of invasive angiography, CT angiography.
However, there were, if one of my patients, a low likelihood of coronary heart disease, but similarly complained of pains in his chest like a normal exercise ECG, it would be difficult to invasive angiography, CT angiography and select Send.
Each has its place in the clinical treatment of patients with heart disease.
Post a Comment